Best Practices for Managing Permissions in Legal Documents

We need to keep legal papers safe from those not allowed to see them to cut risks like stolen data, lost files, and big fines. One break can lose a law firm millions and make clients not trust them. It's very important to manage who can see what to keep things safe and follow rules.

Main Points:

• Role-Based Entry Rules (RBAC): Give access based on jobs (like helpers vs. head lawyers) to make handling rights easier and less likely to mess up.
• Least Access Needed: Only let people reach what they need to do their work.
• Check Rights Often: Look over and fix who can see what often, mainly when jobs or workers change.
• Keep Documents Safe: Use locked up storage, many steps to prove who you are (MFA), and logs that keep track of who sees what.
• Follow Rules: Stick to laws like HIPAA (health info) and GDPR (personal info), and change as per laws in different places.

Quick Look at Key Rules:

How to create an Access Control Policy in under 5 minutes

Basic Rules of Who Can See What

It's key to have a good system to manage who can see files, to keep things safe but keep work going smooth. Some main ideas help legal teams handle important info right and safe.

Role-Based vs. File-Specific Rights

When you're setting up who can get into what, you'll pick between role-based access control (RBAC) and file-specific rights. Each way has its own pros based on what your place needs.

RBAC gives rights based on a person's job in the place. For example, jobs like "paralegal", "associate attorney", or "partner" might have set access levels. This way cuts down on work for the admin team while keeping things very secure ^[1]. On the flip side, file-specific rights let you set access per person's job duty for certain files or folders. But, this way means more work to manage ^[1].

Like, a place might let partners have full rights over files, heads of departments can make changes, and only let needed team members into big cases ^[2]. Many places start with RBAC and add file-specific rights on top for their most private files. These ways work together to stick to the rule of least access, which is another key idea.

The Rule of Least Access

The rule of least access means that users should only get just enough access to do their work - no more, no less. This way greatly cuts down on security risks.

"The principle states that all users should log on with a user account that has the absolute minimum permissions necessary to complete the current task and nothing more. Doing so provides protection against malicious code, among other attacks."

• Microsoft Windows Security Resource Kit

Almost 90% of data leaks come from employee mistakes ^[3], and 78% of those are by chance ^[4]. When staff get too many powers, the risk of accidents or harm goes up. To cut this down, check on user rights often and keep normal accounts apart from those that reach very important files. For short times of high access, set permissions that end on their own when not needed anymore ^[3].

Check Permissions Often

Little access works best when paired with regular checks on permissions. These help find and take out old or unsafe permissions, keeping your system safe.

Important systems should be checked more than the usual ones ^[7]. For instance, top accounts should be checked each month, while those linked to key systems should be reviewed every three months ^[8]. All other user accounts should be checked at least once a year ^[8]. Also, do checks after big events like job changes or when employees leave to update access rights fast.

In these checks, look closely at permissions that have the most risk and think about having checks more often for those accounts ^[6]. Regular training can also help team members know the rules and steps well, making checks work better ^[5]. Tools like Legally.io make this easier by giving detailed records that show who accessed what and when. These not only spot odd activity but also give the proof needed for following rules.

Making Safe Permission Steps

Setting up a good permission system starts by using strong safety ways from the start. The best steps use encrypted storage, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and audit logs to keep important documents safe, yet let teams work easy.

Using Safe Storage and Safe Sites

Keeping important files safe with encrypted storage is key. Law offices often get hit by cyber attacks, so it's very important to keep files safe from those not allowed to see them^[13]. Encryption makes sure that even if someone gets to the data, they can't read it without the right keys.

To keep things very safe, choose cloud storage that comes with end-to-end encryption and MFA. This helps to protect files not only when they are stored but also when they are sent. It's like making sure every door is locked, not just the front one.

Sites like Legally.io add encrypted storage to their systems for handling important legal files. When picking a site, check that it follows rules like ISO 27001 and SOC1, which cover key things like logging and watching^[12]. Next, let's see how MFA helps with keeping control on who can get in.

Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for Better Safe Checks

MFA puts in an extra safe step, stopping 99% of attacks that go for accounts^[10]. Even if passwords are taken by tricks or data leaks, MFA asks for more checks, making it much harder for not allowed people to get in.

"Truth and wisdom in identity management is a collection of verification processes - the more you have, the greater your chances in defending your systems from cyber attacks."

• Justine Phillips, Partner at Baker & McKenzie^[10]

The data is clear: 27% of law offices have had security issues, and 65% of people want offices that focus on keeping data safe^[10]. By using MFA, offices not only make their systems safer but also build trust with clients about handling private info.

Look at Smokeball, for example. In December 2024, they started using two-factor authentication (2FA) to better protect the client data in law offices. To do this, they turned on 2FA in their system settings, checked a phone number with a code, and connected an app like Google Authenticator. With MFA set up, even if someone guesses a laptop password - like if a top boss loses their device at an airport - no one can get in without the second check step.

Keeping Track of Changes with Audit Logs

To add to encryption and MFA, audit logs keep a clear list of every move made on your files. They show who looked at files, when, and what changes they made, making a full trail for being answerable and coming up to standard. If there's a security problem, these logs are key for looking into it thoroughly^[11][9].

Complete audit logs note important details, like:

• The person involved
• The action taken
• The exact time
• The specific files impacted

Top systems also record failed attempts to log in, changes in who can see what, and file downloads. Checking these logs often and setting alerts for odd activity - like access at weird times - can help you spot security risks early.

Besides just watching, audit logs are important for meeting rules. When auditors need proof that you meet data safety standards, detailed logs show how you’ve managed access to sensitive info. In some cases, this proof can be what lets you pass a check or avoid fines.

sbb-itb-4e8a088

Meeting Rules for Legal Work

Dealing with permissions for legal papers is like moving through a big puzzle of U.S. and local rules. In 2019, the usual fee for breaking these rules was a huge $145.33 million ^[21]. U.S. and world basics make the base, but local laws add more rules we can't skip.

HIPAA, GDPR, and Other Rule Sets

Legal papers often have to follow big rule sets like HIPAA and GDPR, each with its own tight rules on who can see them.

HIPAA is for health places in the U.S. and looks after personal health info (PHI) ^[14]. For instance, if you look after health records or disability claims, HIPAA makes you keep admin, body, and tech safety steps ^[16]. The cost for not following can be $100 to $50,000 for each time it happens, with yearly caps of $1.5 million for those who break rules repeatedly ^[15]. Also, you must tell the Department of Health and Human Services if there’s a breach within 60 days ^[17].

GDPR goes further. It covers all personal data and is for any group handling info of EU or UK people ^[14]. GDPR lets people have lots of power over their data, like seeing, fixing, or removing it ^[15]. If you don’t follow GDPR, you could be fined up to €20 million or 4% of global sales, whichever is more ^[14]. You must also report breaches within 72 hours ^[15].

Let's quickly see how these two sets of rules compare:

Both systems need strong ways to manage who gets in. For instance, GDPR wants ways to watch and limit who can see EU citizens' info, while HIPAA needs full logs of who saw PHI and when. If your firm works all over or with health cases, your rules for who gets in must cover both needs. Tools like Legally.io make it simpler by mixing these needs into their setups, saving law firms from tech troubles.

Rules by State for Legal Papers

Federal rules are just the start. In the U.S., with no one main law for data safety, businesses face a mix of state rules ^[18]. Since California got its privacy law in 2018, other states have followed, each with its own rules for managing who sees documents.

For example:

• Maryland doesn't let you sell sensitive info at all ^[19].
• Rhode Island doesn't make firms follow all-out opt-out asks ^[19].
• Texas has rules for little firms, but not those under HIPAA ^[19].

Some states are stricter than others. Like, Delaware needs you to follow if you handle data from at least 35,000 people or make over 20% of your money from selling personal data ^[19]. At the same time, Nebraska and New Hampshire don't set money limits, so even small firms need to follow ^[19]. How fast you need to comply changes too: Tennessee gives firms over two years to adjust, while other states want you to follow right when laws start ^[19].

This mix makes it hard for firms with clients in many states. Good systems for getting in must:

• Limit who sees data based on where the client lives.
• Keep track of okay's with different details as per place.
• Take care of wiping data asks as each state wants.
• Tell on breaches as each state needs.

California's rules are very detailed, with special no-go rights for kids under 16 ^[20] and tougher rules for handling kids' data. States like Virginia, Colorado, Utah, and Connecticut also set tough rules for kids under 13 ^[20].

Think of a divorce case with clients in both California and Texas. The firm would need to track which papers are for Californians to put tight privacy in place. Or, a personal injury case with medical records might need both HIPAA and particular state privacy rules to be followed.

To tackle these puzzles, proactive law firms are getting permission systems that shift with state rules. Rather than tracking every rule manually, they use tools that auto-apply rules based on where the client lives and the info type. As more states get their own privacy rules, investing in a bendy system now can keep firms from later troubles and costs.

Making a Safe and Workable Plan for Permissions

Putting all control of permissions into one plan is a wise choice for any law firm. Data shows that breaches cost about $4.45 million across the world in 2023, as IBM's report on the cost of data breaches says. It's clear that skimping on security can't happen ^[22].

A good way is to use dynamic permissions, which change who can see what and when they can see it, based on roles, situations, or document details ^[24]. For example, a paralegal’s access to important papers might end automatically when a case is done, or outside lawyers might only see files related to their case. Document Logistix says this method: "Dynamic permissions keep control tight on document access and change with what the business needs, making it a safe and easy way to handle important info" ^[24]. These checks also make it easier to review regularly, keeping your defense solid.

Now, concerning reviews, often checking is key in managing permissions. Research shows that 99% of cloud users don't need too much access ^[25]. By having regular checks and smart alerts, you can block unneeded access and keep a strong hold on security.

Rules for login are another must-have level. It's shocking, but 44% of places let you reuse passwords, and 53% let weak ones slide ^[25]. To fight this, put in rules for strong passwords that need changing often, along with two-step verification for better safety.

Of course, just tech isn't enough. A safe setup also must have strong foundations - things like coded storage, safe file-sharing, defenses against viruses, and storing backup copies work together for strong protection ^[22].

Beyond gadgets and systems, your crew is your main guard. The Federal Trade Commission says that "Well-trained staff are the top defense against stolen IDs and data leaks" ^[23]. Teaching your team to know security threats, handle documents right, and react to possible leaks is essential.

Lastly, your approach to permissions must stay open to changes. As Jasmine Henry from JupiterOne points out: "Security pros face new sizes of challenges and need new methods and ideas, and a mindset for the ongoing nature of these changes" ^[25]. Your system should grow with your firm’s size, law changes, and new risks, making sure it stays good against any problem that comes up.

FAQs

What's the main thing that sets apart Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) and file-specific rules for managing legal papers?

Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) vs. File-Specific Rules

When we talk about who gets to see and use legal papers, Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) and file-specific rules each have their own way of doing things, and each come with good points.

RBAC makes it easy to handle who can do what by giving permissions based on roles in a group, like "Manager" or "Paralegal." You don't set rules for each person; you group rights under these roles. This is great for big teams as it makes controlling permissions simpler. It also keeps out rule breakers by making sure people can only reach the files they need for their jobs.

On the flip side, file-specific rules let you pick who can look at or change each paper. This way, you can be very exact in who sees what. Yet, this can be too much to handle in big teams with lots of people and files.

For most work places, RBAC is the smoother pick, letting things run well and safely. Still, file-specific rules are key when the papers are very private or special, needing extra care.

How can you set up multi-factor authentication (MFA) to keep your legal papers safe?

To keep your legal papers safe with multi-factor authentication (MFA), here are some easy steps:

• Pick the right MFA way: Choose a method that works best for how your place runs. This might be an app, a code you get by text, or a device you carry. Each way has its own ease and level of safe-ness.
• Teach your team: Make sure everyone knows why MFA is key and how to do it right. A team that knows what's going on helps protect you first.
• Use MFA where it counts: Put MFA on all key apps and entry points to make sure there are no weak spots in your safety net.
• Look out and keep things up to date: Check your MFA setups and rules now and then to deal with new security problems and risks.

For even better safe keeping, use MFA with strong, one-of-a-kind passwords and make sure you follow laws that protect data. This way, with layers, you will much better guard your documents.

Related posts

• How AI Scores Legal Document Risks